PA Legislature Preempts Communities on Fracking
CELDF Statement on the Legislature’s Passage of
Marcellus Shale Legislation (Act 13 of 2012)
(click here for pdf )
March 2012
The Pennsylvania Legislature recently adopted Act 13 of 2012 (House
Bill 1950) to accelerate the extraction of natural gas from the
Marcellus Shale deposit underlying much of Pennsylvania.
Act 13
is but one of many efforts by the State to preempt people and their
communities from making critical decisions for themselves – including
decisions on fracking – and it’s why communities across Pennsylvania are
now joining forces to fundamentally change how, and perhaps more
importantly, for whom, our structures of law and government work.
The
legislature’s latest action to aid the gas corporations should come as
no surprise. It’s part of a pattern that’s emerged over the years in
which the legislature and State government work hand in hand to place
the interests of corporations over and above our communities.
We
shouldn’t be surprised either that the new bill uses state preemptive
powers to strip people – and their local governments – of the authority
to ban or regulate natural gas extraction. Or further, that it empowers
the state Public Utilities Commission (PUC) to override local
ordinances that run counter to state laws that facilitate gas
extraction.
Act 13 also creates so-called “impact fees” – a
cynical attempt to equate the health, safety, and welfare of our
communities with the resurfacing of roads.
Act 13 punctuates the State’s priority to remove as much power as possible from those who are most impacted by gas extraction.
Prior
to its passage, the State had already all but eviscerated local control
– allowing municipalities to use their zoning powers only to regulate
the placement of surface well pads. Given that horizontal gas drilling
enables corporations to reach gas deposits under protected zones in the
municipality, describing well-pad zoning as a form of “local control”
was a bad joke. Even “legal” zoning measures didn’t stop gas
corporations from suing municipalities – such as South Fayette and Cecil
Townships – when the corporations felt that even minimal zoning
restrictions would interfere with their bottom line.
This is
nothing new. Time and again, the State government has stepped in to
prevent our municipalities from protecting the health, safety, and
welfare of their residents in the face of unrelenting corporate
assaults. In the past decade alone, the State has eliminated local
control over corporate water withdrawals, corporate use of genetically
modified seeds, corporate factory farms, and corporate dumping of sewage
sludge on our farmland.
Granting power to a state agency – in this case, the PUC – to overrule local ordinances isn’t new either.
When Pennsylvania municipalities began enacting local bans to stop
corporate factory farms and corporate sludging of farmland, the State
legislature stepped in on behalf of the agribusiness industry – much as
it has now stepped in on behalf of the gas industry.
Then as
now, the legislature empowered a state agency to override local decision
making by communities – decision making aimed at protecting the
community’s health, safety, and welfare.
That legislation – Act
38, better known as “ACRE” – was adopted in 2005. ACRE empowers the
State Attorney General to represent agribusiness corporations against
municipalities that dare enact local laws challenging corporate farming.
The Attorney General has already sued nearly a dozen
municipalities under ACRE, including rural Packer Township in Carbon
County. In that case, the Attorney General is defending the “right” of
corporations to override the community’s right to protect itself from
sewage sludge being dumped on its farmland. The bitter irony – and the
proof that Pennsylvania’s government has been further privatized – is
that the Attorney General, an elected official, is turning around and
suing the very folks who elected him, on behalf of corporations.
The
Community Environmental Legal Defense Fund’s work, in stark contrast to
other environmental groups across the State, has been to assume that
State government will respond in this manner. Thus, our organizing has
focused on assisting communities to build a framework of local law that
shields that exercise of local control from the State. In short, our
organizing assumes that the State will act to override local control
when that local control threatens the interests of corporations.
Over the past several years, we’ve
assisted the City of Pittsburgh and other municipalities across
Pennsylvania to adopt local ordinances that create a “bill of rights”
for those communities. Further, the ordinances ban State-permitted harms – including gas drilling – that violate those local bills of rights.
These
ordinances advance a realization that is new to many people – that
communities cannot ban activities that are harmful to us so long as we
accept the State’s authority to strip us of community self-government.
Thus, these bans have to be more than bans – they have to refuse to
follow State law – because following State law automatically means that
we lose control of the very future of our townships and boroughs, and
consign them to environmental and community destruction.
For the community-rights ordinances, the passage of Act 13 doesn’t change a thing.
The ordinances have always stood as a frontal challenge to the
authority of the State to override local control, and they continue to
do so under any new legal framework that the State chooses to construct.
Over
100 Pennsylvania municipalities have already adopted these laws. They
confront everything from factory farms to fracking.
The
inevitable result of these local refusals to follow illegitimate State
law is the binding together of hundreds of municipalities to force
constitutional change that overrides the authority of the State to gut
community self-government. That means driving a right to local
self-government into the Pennsylvania Constitution which enables our
communities to begin to actually protect our health, safety, and
welfare, rather than continuing to be at the mercy of gas and other
corporations who solely seek to use our communities for resource
extraction.
Only when we wake up to the fact that this
struggle isn’t about fracking or factory farming or sewage sludging –
and realize that it’s about democracy and community self-government –
will we awaken from this very bad dream. And, only when we realize
that our only option is to override the State legislature, organizing
from the ground up, will we stop negotiating with gas and other
corporations about how much of our community we will sacrifice.
If your community hasn’t already adopted a local “bill of rights” that bans gas drilling, do it tomorrow.
Without a critical mass of communities in Pennsylvania joining
together, constitutional change that liberates our communities to
determine their own futures will remain beyond our reach. And we will
saddle our children with cleaning up the mess – and whatever is left of
our communities and environment – that happened on our watch.
To
learn more, contact the Community Environmental Legal Defense Fund at
info@celdf.org.










